SunSentinel, January 17, 2017. Attorney Joshua Gerstin recently provided Alliance of Delray Residential Associations members with advice on medically necessary pets, making decisions through emails and governing documents, topics that community board of directors will face this year. Read full article here.
To watch the video presentation or to download the presentation by Joshua Gerstin, Esq. click here.
Please click here for a copy of the January 4, 2017 presentation of:
Presented by Joshua Gerstin, Esq. for the Delray Alliance of Residential Associations.
Please click here for a copy of the January 4, 2017 presentation.
By Seth Amkraut, Esq.
Click here for .pdf version of this article
Many community associations in Florida screen prospective buyers and tenants. This screening process typically includes a comprehensive background check into each applicant’s credit, rental, employment and criminal history. Recently, an interpretation by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) of a recent United States Supreme Court Case, Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs, et al v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc., et al., severely curtailed community associations’ ability to deny sales or rentals to convicted criminals. Enforcing blanket bans on convicted criminals purchasing or renting in your community can now subject both the community association and its Board members, individually, to liability.
With particularly awful circular reasoning, HUD issued an April 4, 2016, guidance memorandum declaring a higher percentage of adult minorities have criminal records when compared to the overall adult population. Therefore, prohibiting a person with a criminal conviction to buy or rent in your community has a “disparate impact” on certain racial minorities tantamount to racial discrimination. Considering racial discrimination in housing violates federal law, HUD rounds the final corner and declares by extension the blanket use of criminal records to deny housing violates Federal law. This is a critical pronouncement effectively outlawing all blanket prohibitions on individuals with a criminal history and calls into question less restrictive policies. Even a narrowly tailored policy excluding only certain types of criminals must accurately distinguish between criminal conduct representing a genuine risk to other residents or property.
Making matters worse, HUD’s guidance on this issue shifts the long-standing burden requiring a Plaintiff to prove their case. Instead, community associations will be presumed to have discriminated against a proposed tenant or purchaser if a person within a protected class (e.g. a racial minority) is denied housing simply due to the person’s prior criminal record. To rebut this presumption, community associations will have to prove the association’s denial of housing to persons with a “criminal history” actually assists in protecting resident safety and/or property. The only exception is for criminal convictions relating to manufacturing or distributing controlled substances. In essence, HUD has determined violent felons, such as murderers or rapists, are less dangerous than people manufacturing or distributing illegal drugs.
As experienced Board members will tell you, often times upset owners (and their accommodating lawyers) name board members individually in lawsuits. More often than not, these lawsuits are defended (and dismissed) by an association’s insurance counsel. However, most community insurance association policies will not offer coverage for housing discrimination or similar claims. Without such coverage, both the association and the individual board members will have to pay out- of-pocket for representation and any resulting damages. Although the individual board members may seek reimbursement from the Association (indemnification), claims for housing discrimination are known as intentional torts or intentional statutory violations. Typically, community associations are not required to indemnify individual board members against claims for damages related to intentional conduct. As you can surmise, the result of not a board member not being indemnified by his/her community association can be financially ruinous.
There is no one size fits all formula for creating Fair Housing Act compliant criminal background policies. In this new legal landscape, every community association that considers criminal history when evaluating prospective buyers and tenants must be prepared to defend the inevitable claims filed by rejected applicants.
Gerstin & Associates can assist your community association with drafting a criminal background policy allowing for the rejection of the most dangerous applicants while minimizing the risk of liability for discriminatory practices. Contact our office today for a free consultation.
Stay one-step ahead of new legislation, recent case law and new developments that impact your community association by subscribing to the Gerstin & Associates Community Association Newsletter. Please complete and either email or fax the following to: (561) 750-8185 (no cover page needed).
Name: ____________________________ Association name: _____________________
Position at the association (director, property manager, etc.) _____________________
Email address: ______________________ Telephone number: __________________
–By Joshua Gerstin, Esq.
Click here for .pdf version of this article
June 1, 2016
1. Time is running out. Condominium associations with more than two floors have until December 31, 2016, to vote on forgoing the State of Florida’s mandated sprinkler retrofitting/life safety system requirements or obtain a building permit for its installation.
2. The required retrofitting includes installing a fire sprinkler system or other life safety system within the condominium association’s common elements and individual units.
3. By December 31, 2016, a residential condominium association that has not voted to forego retrofitting must initiate an application for a building permit for the required installation demonstrating the association will become compliant by December 31, 2019.
4. If a condominium association wants to opt-out of the retrofitting requirement it must act now and obtain a vote by the majority of all voting interests through either: (1) a limited proxy; (2) a ballot cast at a duly called membership meeting with at least 14 days advance notice; or (3) the execution of a written consent by a member.
5. No later than 30 days after the opt out vote, results must be mailed or hand delivered to all unit owners.
6. An opt-out vote by the members is effective only upon its recording in the county’s Official Public Records. A report must be filed with The State of Florida’s Division of Condominiums, Timeshares and Mobile Homes, indicating the membership vote and enclosing proof the vote was recorded in the county’s Official Public Records.
7. After the recording of a successful opt out vote, all owners are required to provide a copy of the opt-out vote to all future potential purchaser or tenants of their unit.
8. Opting out of fire sprinkler/life safety system retrofitting could pose a major fire hazard, cause an increase in insurance premiums and a decrease in property values.
9. Deciding to forgo fire sprinkler retrofitting should be based on more than the cost of compliance. Local fire departments should be consulted to ensure adequate life-safety protections are in place. At a minimum, a condominium association should consider the following:
a) Does the association have a fire emergency plan? If so, have the residents and employees been given full instructions on the details of the plan?
b) Can the buildings be evacuated to the street without interfering with emergency personnel?
c) How will the association handle the evacuation of physically challenged residents?
d) Are all exit doors and exit ways marked, clear and well lit in the dark?
e) Are emergency items (fire extinguishers, defibrillators, etc.) in place and functional?
Please do not hesitate to contact our office for further information regarding Florida’s sprinkler retrofitting requirements for condominium associations.
Background
Can Florida community associations prohibit drone use? What can a community association do to minimize legal liability if it decides to prohibit or permit drones? Drone usage is only going to increase over time. Acting now to intelligently regulate usage is the best way to safeguard members and increase property values. Following are some pointers to get your community association started in the right direction and ahead of the curve.
In 2015, the Florida legislature passed the “Freedom from Unwanted Surveillance Act” (“Act”). Located at Section 934.50 of the Florida Statutes, the Act limits the use of drones by governmental and private entities. The Act prohibits operating a drone with a camera to record privately owned real property or the occupant of that property in violation of that person’s reasonable expectation of privacy. If a person cannot be seen on a property by anyone at ground level, a reasonable expectation of privacy exists.
The Act exempts the use of drone cameras by a person who is in a profession licensed by the state, to perform reasonable tasks within the scope of practice or activities permitted under that person’s license. Theoretically, a licensed community association manager could use a drone camera to check for violations within the community. Also exempted are “cargo delivery drones” if the drone and its operator are in compliance with the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) regulations. For recreational drones, the FAA has only issued an advisory to stay below 400 feet, within the sight of the operator and away from airports.
How Can/Should Community Associations Regulate Drones?
a) Banning Drones is Not a Good Idea. As with satellite dishes and emotional support pets, outright bans imposed by community associations are often overruled. Avoid having to amend your governing documents if a legislator undertakes drones as a personal cause by using reasonable Rules to regulate drone use in your community association.
b) Prohibit Landing Drones on Common Areas (homeowner associations only). Owners should be prohibited from directing commercial delivery drones to land on a common area. Otherwise, the Association can be subject to liability if a drone related accident occurs. Malfunctioning drones crashing, packages dropped on people and landing on people and pets are only a few of the possible drone safety hazards.
c) Common Area Landing Site (Condos Only). Due to limited space within condominium associations and the nature of high-rise buildings, condominium owners are unable to direct drones to land on their own property. Instead of having a condominium unit owner place himself and others in danger by trying to land a drone on his/her patio or balcony, consider establishing a common area landing site. Safeguarding the site with warning signs and a fence, far away from a crowded space, could minimize potential safety hazards of wandering owners. Considering the time and effort it takes to alter a common area, the sooner a condominium association begins the process, the better off it will be.
d) Restrict Delivery Times. As with land based parcel deliveries, associations should pass Rules that limiting drone delivery times. Permissible drone delivery times should be during the day at times when most residents are at work or away from their homes. Due to noise concerns consider banning drone deliveries on weekends.
e) Liability: associations should consider amending their governing documents to limit the association’s liability for damages to persons or property relating to drone deliveries. The act of ordering a drone delivery should be considered the conduct that signifies the owner’s agreement to indemnify the association for damages to persons or property related to his/her drone delivery.
Stay one-step ahead of new legislation, recent case law and new developments that impact your community association by subscribing to the Gerstin & Associates Community Association Newsletter. Please complete and fax the following to: (561) 750-8185 (no cover page needed).
Name: ____________________________ Association name: _____________________
Position at the association (director, property manager, etc.) _____________________
Email address: ______________________ Telephone number: __________________
The 2016 Florida Legislative Session will begin on January 12, 2016. In Florida’s House of Representatives, three bills seeking to drastically alter the governance and operation of HOAs and property managers have already been filed.
Florida 2016, HB 653, grants authority to the Division of Condominium, Timeshares, and Mobile Homes to regulate homeowner associations in a manner similar to condominium associations
Florida 2016,HB 665-Property Managers: seeks to place stricter licensing requirements and disciplinary proceedings on property managers and property management companies.
Florida HB 2016 667 seeks to combine HOA statutes (720), condo statutes (718) and cooperatives statutes (7210) into one body of law entitled “Common Interest Communities Act”.
None of these pending bills have a Senate companion.
Add a Hyatt House to the growing list of new hotels expected to debut in Palm Beach County within two years. Read more
According to Richard Bennett of JDsupra.com, late last week a federal court in Florida tossed a condominium association’s claims that it was entitled to replace undamaged hallway carpeting, wallpaper, baseboards, and woodwork in order to “achieve aesthetic uniformity” with similar hallway components replaced after water damage. In Great Amer. Ins. Co. v. Towers of Quayside No. 4 Condominium Ass’n., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150358, 2015 WL 6773870 (S.D. Fla., Nov. 4, 2015), the court held that replacing undamaged property to insure “matching” is only appropriate if the repairs concern “a continuous run” of items such as that.
Read more
Clerk of Court of Miami-Dade County
Clerk of Court of Broward County
Clerk of Court of Palm Beach County
Broward County Property Appraiser
Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser
Palm Beach County Property Appraiser
Realtor® Association of Miami-Dade County
REALTOR® Asociation of Greater Fort Lauderdale
Realtors Assoc. of the Palm Beaches
This general site for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development contains information on homes and communities.
National Association of Realtors®
This website of the National Association of Realtors® contains information about the real estate industry, including a section on real estate law and policy.
RAMB – Realtor® Association of Greater Miami and the Beaches
This site is a comprehensive resource for residential and commercial real estate in the greater Miami area.
This site includes numerous real estate related resources, including links to information about buying, selling, financing, and improving real property.
This resource contains a collection of data on U.S. housing from the Census Bureau.
This Web site from the National Housing Conference, a non-profit organization dedicated to advancing affordable housing for every American, contains housing news and articles and a Paycheck to Paycheck interactive database that allows visitors to select an occupation and a community to determine affordability of housing.
The National Housing Institute site contains information and articles regarding affordable housing and building communities.
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development offers this database containing abstracts and citations to research reports, articles, books, and data on housing policy, building methods, economic development, urban planning and other similar topics.
Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA)
The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council Web site contains several reports on home mortgage lending and mortgage insurance in addition to statistical data and other information.
The Leadership Conference on Civil Rights Education Fund Web site contains resources regarding fair housing issues, including summaries of major federal and state fair housing laws.
For printable .pdf version click here.
New 2015 Florida Statutes Affecting Both Condominium and Homeowner Associations:
1. Voting Rights Suspensions (applies to HOAs and condos): An association may now suspend the voting rights of a member or unit due to the non-payment of any fee, fine or other monetary obligation due to the association which is more than 90 days delinquent. Owners whose voting rights have been suspended are not counted towards the total number of votes of a homeowners’ or condominium owners’ association. Further, a suspension of voting or common element use rights can apply to all of an owner’s tenants and guests, including multiple unit owners, even if the delinquency that resulted in the suspension arose from less than all of the multiple units owned by a member.
2. Proxies (applies to HOAs and condos): A copy of a proxy is valid and can be transmitted to a community association via email (scan) or by fax. Facilitates voting from absentee owners.
3. Electronic Voting (applies to HOAs and condos): Allows for the establishment of online voting. Specific requirements are set forth in the law, including the passage of a resolution by the Board authorizing online voting. Owners that do not affirmatively consent to online voting are required to be given paper voting materials.
4. Fines (applies to HOAs and condos): Prohibits board members and individuals residing in a board member’s household from serving on a Fining Committee. The new law also requires a community association’s Board of Directors, not its Fining Committee, to levy a fine. In turn, a Fining Committee’s authority is limited to rejecting or approving the fine levied by the Board. A fine that is rejected by a Fining Committee is not imposed. The new law fails to set forth the notice requirements to owners for the Board of Directors meeting in which a fine is levied.
5. Electronic Notice (applies to HOAs and condos): No longer is the authority to transmit association notices required to be in the association’s Governing Documents. A member’s consent to electronic transmission is now the only requirement.
6. Service Animals (applies to HOA’s and condos): New law specifies the conditions where a service animal may be removed or excluded, penalties are provided for the misrepresentation of a service animal. In addition to the criminal penalties in the existing law, a business unlawfully denying or interfering with an individual’s right to use or train a service animal may be sentenced to perform 30 hours of community service with an organization that serves individuals with disabilities. This law does not affect “emotional support animals” which are the majority of the exceptions issued in pet restricted communities. As such, this new law will have little effect on the issue of emotional support animals in a pet restricted community.
7. Required Notice to Tenants (applies to HOAs and condos): A bona fide tenant must be given at least 30 days’ notice before being evicted from a foreclosed home.
8. Transient Occupancy, Squatters (applies to HOAs and condos): New law removes “transient occupancy” from the landlord-tenant regulation under Chapter 83. Squatters and transients can be removed from a residence by law enforcement officials instead of having to file for an eviction.
9. Drones (applies to HOAs and condos): If a reasonable expectation of privacy exists, a person, state agency or political subdivision are prohibited from using a drone to capture an image of privately owned real property or of the owner, tenant, or occupant of such property with the intent to conduct surveillance without his or her written consent. The existing law enforcement exception, subject to certain conditions, was expanded to include activities by any person or entity engaged in a business licensed by the state (such as property appraisers, utilities, cargo delivery systems). Civil remedies for violations include compensatory damages, punitive damages and injunctive relief.
10. Construction Defects (applies to HOAs and condos): In addition to the existing requirements of Chapter 558, Florida Statutes, this new law introduces a new method for resolving construction defect disputes before filing a lawsuit.
11. Private Property Rights (applies to HOAs and Condos): Bert Harris Private Property Rights Act was amended to create a cause of action for damages if a landowner is subjected to local and state governmental requirements so onerous they are considered “unconstitutional exactions”. Landowners now have a legal remedy when a state or local government make extortionate demands on property owners in exchange for permit approvals. Pre-suit notice to the government is required. If a lawsuit is filed, the governmental entity is required to prove the exaction complies with the standards set by the U.S. Supreme Court and the property owner must prove damages. The measure of damages recoverable are clarified and include injunctive relief, costs and attorney fees. Governmental entities may recover attorney fees and costs if they prevail.
New 2015 Florida Statutes Affecting Condominium Associations Only
1. Application of Assessment Payments (applies to condos only): The use of “full and final” payment language on a check for partial payment does not apply to, nor overcome the existing statutory requirements for applying the partial payment of assessments (accrued interest, administrative late fees, costs, attorney’s fees, the delinquent assessment). Allows an association to accept a partial payment without fear an owner is trying to establish an “accord and satisfaction” fact pattern to eliminate the remaining amounts owed.
2. Damage Not Caused by Insurable Event (applies to condos only): Clarifies damage not caused by an insurable event is not automatically an association responsibility. Instead, the unit owner or the association is responsible for non-insurable events according to the reconstruction, repair or replacement provisions of the association’s Governing Documents.
3. Official Records (condos only): Non-written records (audio recordings, videos of board meetings or security camera video recordings, etc.) are not “official records” available for owner inspection as a matter of right.
4. Extension of Bulk Assignee/Bulk Buyer Classification (Condos only): The bulk buyer law is extended until July, 2018. Bulk buyers of distressed condominium projects are granted additional immunity from various typical developer obligations.
5. Expenses in Annual Budget (condos only): Extends and clarifies the minimum applicable expenses that have to be listed in an annual budget. Full list of expenses available at Florida Statute §718.504(21).
6. Lien for Late Fees (condos only): Administrative late fees can now be included on a claim of lien for past due assessments. Important for condominiums associations whose Governing Documents do not provide for the imposition of late fees.
7. Condominium Association Terminations (condos only): New restrictions imposed on the termination of condominiums created by the conversion of existing improvements under Part VI of the Condominium Act. The methodology for determining market value of condominium units is clarified. First mortgages are now required to be fully satisfied prior to termination of the condominium. Further, if a termination vote fails, another vote to terminate may not be considered for 18 months. When holding a termination vote, voting interests that have been suspended are still entitled to vote on the termination. In addition, a termination vote may not take place until 5 years after the recording of the declaration of condominium, unless there is no objection to the termination.
New 2015 Florida Statutes Affecting Homeowner Associations Only
1. Amendments (HOAs only): Failure to provide the required statutory notice of the recordation of an amendment does not nullify or affect the validity of the amendment.
2. Naming Florida Statute Section 720 (HOAs only): Chapter 720 of the Florida statutes is now officially known as the “Homeowners’ Association Act”.
3. Board Member Delinquencies/Eligibility (HOAs only): Any person who is delinquent in the payment of any financial obligation as of the last day he or she could nominate himself or herself to the board, is not eligible to be a candidate and may not be listed on the ballot. Additionally, any director 90 days delinquent in the payment of any monetary obligation is deemed to have abandoned his or her directorship. In such instances, a vacancy required to be filled according to law and the association’s Governing Documents is created.
Stay one-step ahead of new legislation, recent case law and new developments that impact your community association by subscribing to the Gerstin & Associates Community Association Newsletter. Please complete and fax the following to: (561) 750-8185 (no cover page needed).
Name: ____________________________
Association name: _____________________
Position at the association (director, property manager, etc.) _____________________
Email address: ______________________
Telephone number: __________________
"The purpose of law is to prevent the strong from always having their way."
--- Ovid