Gerstin & Associates Commercial Litigation, Community Associations & Commercial Real Estate

April 14, 2011

Florida Supreme Court Alters Community Association Declarations, in a Big Way.

Posted by : gerstin

Did Florida’s Supreme Court render laws governing condominium and homeowner association declarations useless and unenforceable?

Click here to read the Court’s full opinion

Florida’s community associations across the state are becoming increasingly concerned the legislature can no longer pass laws that affect Florida’s condominium and homeowner associations after the Supreme Court’s recent decision in  Cohn v. Grand.  Florida’s community associations should be concerned and need to take action, but as explained below all hope is far from lost.

The facts:

1.      The Grand was a condo hotel.

2.      When owner Cohn purchased a unit the Grand the Declaration stated “unit owners would governed by the “the Condominium Act of the State of Florida in effect as of the date of recording this Declaration.”

3.      The Declaration did not include the phrase, “as amended from time to time.”

4.      The dispute specifically arose as to whether the unit owners are afforded voting rights in accordance with the Condominium Act in effect at the time the Declaration was recorded or were said voting rights altered over time by each amendment made to legislation relating to condominium associations and in particular voting.

The legal argument:

Unit owners’ contractual rights, defined by the terms of the Florida Condominium Act (“Act”) at a fixed point in time, do not vary when changes to the Act are made because the term “as amended from time to time” was not included in the Declaration.

Florida law applied to the facts and the legal argument:

An overriding principle embedded in the Florida Constitution is that “state action” (legislation) that impairs a contract is unconstitutional. In determining whether legislation impairs a contract a three part test is used and the results are weighed and balanced:

1)      To what extent are the contractual rights impaired;

2)      Does the state have a good reason for enacting policy that changes contractual rights; and

3)      Are the means the state will use to achieve this policy reasonable?

The issue in Grand related to owner voting which has long been considered a substantive right. As such, the Court gave greater weight to item # 1 above and less to item # 2.

The Court’s Decision:

The Florida Supreme Court held “The Constitution prohibits the impairment of contracts; and the statute regulating mixed-use condominiums (F.S. 718.404(2)) impaired the Grand’s unit owner’s contractual rights, which are established in the Grand’s declaration.” In other words, the law at the time the Declaration was recorded, not at the present time, was the law that applies to owners’ voting rights in the Grand.


What this means to your Association:

The Grand decision should not be read as the end of legislative control over Florida community associations.. Surely, rules relating to enforcement of covenants would not be considered a substantive right that any  legislative changes would be outweighed and nullified. Instead, each such case will be reviewed by the courts on a “case-by-case” basis, if the magic words “as amended from time to time” is not in the Declaration.

What to do:

Check your community association’s Declaration and determine whether the drafter included the words “as amended from time to time” in relation to statutes that will be used to enforce and interpret the Declaration (Condo. Act or HOA Act.). If not, speak with your community association’s attorney and begin the process of amending your community association’s Declaration.


No Comments

(will not be published)

RSS South Florida Business, Real Estate & Litigation Headlines

  • West Palm Beach doctor indicted in bribery scheme along with U.S. Sen. Robert Menendez April 1, 2015
    West Palm Beach resident Salomon Melgen and Union City, N.J. resident and U.S. Senator Robert Menendez, (D-N.J.) were indicted Thursday for a bribery scheme, according to the U.S. Justice Department. Melgen, 61, an ophthalmologist, owned Vitreo-Retinal Consultants of the Palm Beaches (VRC) and operated his practice through VRC, according to the indictment associated with the […]
  • Miami Gardens retail center slated for redevelopment after acquisition April 1, 2015
    I.M.C. Property Management purchased a 32.8-acre shopping center in Miami Gardens and plans to redevelop it. The North Miami-based developer paid $7.08 million for the 281,000-square-foot retail plaza, which was developed in 1958. It’s located at 18000 N.W. 27th Ave. and comprises of three parcels at the southwest corner of Northwest 27th Avenue and Miami […]
  • Doral office building sold for $23.5M April 1, 2015
    A Doral office building leased to British engineering firm Atkins was sold for $23.5 million. Cornerstone International Realty’s Hector Cataño, Frank Trelles and George Smith represented the buyer and seller in the deal. It was acquired by Casa Bella Toy 14, a 1031 tax exchange managed by Francisco Martinez-Celeiro in Miami that used proceeds from […]
  • Billionaire Jones inks one of priciest mansion purchases in history of Palm Beach April 1, 2015
    Billionaire Paul Tudor Jones II paid $71.2 million for an oceanfront estate in Palm Beach, making it one of the priciest transactions ever in the wealthy haven. Developers Dwight C. Schar and Martha M. Schar sold the 32,830-square-foot home on 1.94 acres at 1300 S. Ocean Blvd to Tudor, a hedge fund manager from Greenwich, […]

RSS South Florida Community Association Headlines