In Eagle’s Crest, LLC v. Republic Bank, — So.3d —-, 2010 WL 3059529 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010), the court held once an expert is “qualified” by a court the expert’s opinions are admissible despite their lack of credible conclusion or methodology. However, the conclusions and methodology are subject to scrutiny by the opposing party. A/K/A a field day for an attorney skilled in cross examinations. Read case here.
"Advice is judged by results, not intentions. Brevity is a great charm of eloquence."
--- Marcus Tullius Cicero